FLUR
Franklin International Equity Index ETF

Full FLUR fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Compare Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FLUR provides Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities. When evaluating costs, FLUR features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FLUR has returned 12.49% year-to-date with +$71 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.15% with -$123 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FLUR
+5.19%+12.31%+12.49%+27.60%+66.75%
ZUT
+3.37%+8.11%+20.15%+28.32%+51.67%
Flows
FLUR
+$40 M+$62 M+$71 M+$121 M+$261 M
ZUT
-$58 M-$42 M-$123 M+$24 M+$184 M

FLUR vs ZUT exposure

Countries

FLUR
Japan
20.55%
United Kingdom
14.97%
Switzerland
8.97%
Germany
8.95%
France
8.76%
Australia
7.93%
Other
29.86%
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%

Sectors

FLUR
Financials
24.29%
Industrials
17.80%
Information Technology
9.71%
Consumer Discretionary
8.52%
Health Care
7.37%
Other
32.32%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FLUR
ASML HOLDING
2.65%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.52%
CH1499059983
1.42%
ASTRAZENECA
1.40%
NOVARTIS
1.37%
NESTLE SA
1.30%
SHELL PLC
1.24%
SIEMENS
1.08%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
1.03%
BHP GROUP LTD
0.99%
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%

Diversification

FLUR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 702 total
14.01%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%

Characteristics

Compare
FLUR
ZUT
ProviderFranklin TempletonBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.13%2.77%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 20, 2019January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about FLUR and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLUR or ZUT?
As of June 19, 2026, FLUR has returned 12.49% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.15%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLUR or ZUT?
As of June 19, 2026, FLUR manages $585.48 M in assets, while ZUT manages $844.73 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLUR and ZUT managed?
FLUR is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FLUR and ZUT emphasize?
FLUR is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLUR or ZUT?
Year to date, FLUR has seen +$71.34 M in net flows, compared with -$122.59 M for ZUT. FLUR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLUR and ZUT compare?
FLUR has an expense ratio of 0.10%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of FLUR and ZUT?
FLUR's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLUR or ZUT?
FLUR holds 661 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, FLUR is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about FLUR and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds