VS
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (CA) (FLVI) and CIBC Qx International Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FLVI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications, while CQLI leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, FLVI features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.4% for CQLI. Performance-wise, FLVI has returned 13.54% year-to-date with +$137 M in net flows, whereas CQLI is at 10.19% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLVI
CQLI
| AuM | $322.88 M | $682.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | 3.35% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLVI | +0.37% | +3.22% | +13.54% | +19.73% | - |
CQLI | -2.58% | +2.09% | +10.19% | +11.57% | +61.44% | |
| Flows | FLVI | -$0 M | +$27 M | +$137 M | +$197 M | - |
CQLI | -$1 M | +$22 M | +$55 M | +$56 M | +$576 M |
FLVI vs CQLI exposure
Countries
FLVI
Japan
14.39%
Singapore
12.80%
Italy
11.57%
Switzerland
10.55%
France
10.19%
Germany
7.40%
Other
33.10%
CQLI
France
11.89%
Switzerland
10.81%
Australia
10.56%
Singapore
9.44%
Japan
7.24%
Other
50.06%
Sectors
FLVI
Finance
27.42%
Utilities
16.03%
Telecommunications
11.50%
Industrials
10.40%
Energy
8.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.43%
Other
18.70%
CQLI
Finance
41.52%
Utilities
13.89%
Telecommunications
12.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.67%
Industrials
8.81%
Other
12.19%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLVI
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
3.14%
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
3.05%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
3.03%
Deutsche Post AG
2.86%
Repsol SA
2.79%
Enel SpA
2.66%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.61%
Nordea Bank Abp
2.60%
ENGIE SA
2.51%
SNAM SpA
2.46%
CQLI
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.89%
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
1.79%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.70%
Orange SA
1.57%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
1.53%
Iberdrola SA
1.47%
Enel SpA
1.47%
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
1.47%
Tesco Plc
1.45%
DNB Bank ASA
1.42%
Diversification
FLVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
27.72%
CQLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
15.78%
Characteristics
Compare
FLVI
CQLI
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | CIBC |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.45% | 3.24% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 28, 2024 | November 16, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FLVI and CQLI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLVI or CQLI?
As of September 10, 2026, FLVI has returned 13.54% year to date, while CQLI has returned 10.19%. FLVI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLVI or CQLI?
As of September 10, 2026, FLVI manages $322.88 M in assets, while CQLI manages $682.26 M. CQLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLVI and CQLI managed?
FLVI is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark. CQLI is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FLVI and CQLI emphasize?
FLVI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. CQLI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLVI or CQLI?
Year to date, FLVI has seen +$136.72 M in net flows, compared with +$55.32 M for CQLI. FLVI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLVI and CQLI compare?
FLVI has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while CQLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of FLVI and CQLI?
FLVI's largest holdings include Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd., Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, and DBS Group Holdings Ltd.. CQLI's top holdings include DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Assicurazioni Generali SpA, and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLVI or CQLI?
FLVI holds 119 securities, while CQLI holds 100. On holdings count, FLVI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLVI and CQLI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.