VS
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (CA) (FLVI) and CIBC Qx International Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FLVI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications, while CQLI leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, FLVI features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.4% for CQLI. Performance-wise, FLVI has returned 11.23% year-to-date with +$143 M in net flows, whereas CQLI is at 13.12% with +$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLVI
CQLI
| AuM | $319.74 M | $700.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | 4.44% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLVI | +0.28% | -2.40% | +11.23% | +15.89% | - |
CQLI | +4.01% | -1.24% | +13.12% | +14.72% | +65.37% | |
| Flows | FLVI | +$6 M | +$6 M | +$143 M | +$175 M | - |
CQLI | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$60 M | +$61 M | +$580 M |
FLVI vs CQLI exposure
Countries
FLVI
Japan
15.20%
Singapore
13.63%
Italy
10.70%
Switzerland
10.30%
France
9.79%
Hong Kong
7.29%
Other
33.08%
CQLI
France
10.66%
Switzerland
10.61%
Australia
10.33%
Singapore
8.54%
Japan
7.77%
Other
52.09%
Sectors
FLVI
Finance
27.71%
Utilities
16.02%
Telecommunications
12.17%
Industrials
9.89%
Energy
8.56%
Other
25.65%
CQLI
Finance
42.10%
Utilities
13.81%
Telecommunications
13.21%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.48%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
11.86%
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLVI
Repsol SA
2.84%
Nordea Bank Abp
2.70%
Deutsche Post AG
2.62%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.60%
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
2.58%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
2.55%
TotalEnergies SE
2.51%
Rio Tinto Plc
2.46%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
2.43%
Enel SpA
2.42%
CQLI
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
1.81%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB
1.74%
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
1.58%
SoftBank Corp.
1.57%
DNB Bank ASA
1.54%
Iberdrola SA
1.53%
ageas SA/NV
1.47%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.46%
Tesco Plc
1.45%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
1.45%
Diversification
FLVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 118 total
25.71%
CQLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
15.60%
Characteristics
Compare
FLVI
CQLI
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | CIBC |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.31% | 3.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 28, 2024 | November 16, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FLVI and CQLI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLVI or CQLI?
As of November 3, 2026, FLVI has returned 11.23% year to date, while CQLI has returned 13.12%. CQLI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLVI or CQLI?
As of November 3, 2026, FLVI manages $319.74 M in assets, while CQLI manages $700.61 M. CQLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLVI and CQLI managed?
FLVI is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark. CQLI is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FLVI and CQLI emphasize?
FLVI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. CQLI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLVI or CQLI?
Year to date, FLVI has seen +$142.58 M in net flows, compared with +$60.03 M for CQLI. FLVI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLVI and CQLI compare?
FLVI has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while CQLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of FLVI and CQLI?
FLVI's largest holdings include Repsol SA, Nordea Bank Abp, and Deutsche Post AG. CQLI's top holdings include Assicurazioni Generali SpA, Svenska Handelsbanken AB, and Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLVI or CQLI?
FLVI holds 118 securities, while CQLI holds 100. On holdings count, FLVI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLVI and CQLI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.