VS
When evaluating costs, FLVI features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, FLVI has returned 13% year-to-date with +$137 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 14.9% with +$483 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLVI
FCIQ
| AuM | $321.34 M | $1,979.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | 3.35% | -0.88% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLVI | -0.19% | +3.41% | +13.00% | +19.54% | - |
FCIQ | -3.22% | +8.19% | +14.90% | +15.28% | +60.22% | |
| Flows | FLVI | -$0 M | +$27 M | +$137 M | +$197 M | - |
FCIQ | +$44 M | +$124 M | +$483 M | +$652 M | +$1,148 M |
FLVI vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
FLVI
Japan
14.39%
Singapore
12.80%
Italy
11.57%
Switzerland
10.55%
France
10.19%
Germany
7.40%
Other
33.10%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FLVI
Finance
27.42%
Utilities
16.03%
Telecommunications
11.50%
Industrials
10.40%
Energy
8.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.43%
Other
18.70%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLVI
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
3.14%
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
3.05%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
3.03%
Deutsche Post AG
2.86%
Repsol SA
2.79%
Enel SpA
2.66%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.61%
Nordea Bank Abp
2.60%
ENGIE SA
2.51%
SNAM SpA
2.46%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FLVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
27.72%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FLVI
FCIQ
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.46% | 1.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 28, 2024 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FLVI and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLVI or FCIQ?
As of September 10, 2026, FLVI has returned 13.00% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 14.90%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLVI or FCIQ?
As of September 10, 2026, FLVI manages $321.34 M in assets, while FCIQ manages $1.98 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLVI and FCIQ managed?
FLVI is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLVI or FCIQ?
Year to date, FLVI has seen +$136.72 M in net flows, compared with +$483.11 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLVI and FCIQ compare?
FLVI has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about FLVI and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.