VS
When evaluating costs, FLVI features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, FLVI has returned 11.17% year-to-date with +$140 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 17.52% with +$539 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLVI
FCIQ
| AuM | $316.64 M | $2,081.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | 4.47% | -0.89% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLVI | -1.85% | -2.03% | +11.17% | +15.73% | - |
FCIQ | +1.34% | +4.09% | +17.52% | +13.99% | +70.92% | |
| Flows | FLVI | +$3 M | +$6 M | +$140 M | +$177 M | - |
FCIQ | +$36 M | +$118 M | +$539 M | +$626 M | +$1,234 M |
FLVI vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
FLVI
Japan
14.74%
Singapore
13.00%
Italy
11.15%
Switzerland
10.41%
France
9.94%
Germany
7.47%
Other
33.28%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FLVI
Finance
27.68%
Utilities
15.64%
Telecommunications
11.71%
Industrials
10.13%
Energy
8.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.14%
Other
19.17%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLVI
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
3.38%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
3.11%
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
3.04%
Repsol SA
2.96%
Deutsche Post AG
2.88%
Rio Tinto Plc
2.68%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.64%
Nordea Bank Abp
2.63%
Enel SpA
2.57%
Nestlé SA
2.36%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FLVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
28.24%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FLVI
FCIQ
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.31% | 1.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 28, 2024 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FLVI and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLVI or FCIQ?
As of October 27, 2026, FLVI has returned 11.17% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 17.52%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLVI or FCIQ?
As of October 27, 2026, FLVI manages $316.64 M in assets, while FCIQ manages $2.08 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLVI and FCIQ managed?
FLVI is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLVI or FCIQ?
Year to date, FLVI has seen +$139.65 M in net flows, compared with +$539.41 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLVI and FCIQ compare?
FLVI has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about FLVI and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.