VS
Compare Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (CA) (FLVI) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FLVI provides Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, FLVI features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FLVI has returned 13.54% year-to-date with +$137 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 11.61% with -$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLVI
ZUT
| AuM | $322.88 M | $805.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | 3.35% | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLVI | +0.37% | +3.22% | +13.54% | +19.73% | - |
ZUT | -5.59% | -7.33% | +11.61% | +17.34% | +47.29% | |
| Flows | FLVI | -$0 M | +$27 M | +$137 M | +$197 M | - |
ZUT | +$5 M | -$17 M | -$95 M | -$106 M | +$217 M |
FLVI vs ZUT exposure
Countries
FLVI
Japan
14.39%
Singapore
12.80%
Italy
11.57%
Switzerland
10.55%
France
10.19%
Germany
7.40%
Other
33.10%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
FLVI
Finance
27.42%
Utilities
16.03%
Telecommunications
11.50%
Industrials
10.40%
Energy
8.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.43%
Other
18.70%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLVI
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
3.14%
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA
3.05%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
3.03%
Deutsche Post AG
2.86%
Repsol SA
2.79%
Enel SpA
2.66%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.61%
Nordea Bank Abp
2.60%
ENGIE SA
2.51%
SNAM SpA
2.46%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
FLVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
27.72%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
FLVI
ZUT
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.45% | 2.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 28, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FLVI and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLVI or ZUT?
As of September 11, 2026, FLVI has returned 13.54% year to date, while ZUT has returned 11.61%. FLVI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLVI or ZUT?
As of September 11, 2026, FLVI manages $322.88 M in assets, while ZUT manages $805.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLVI and ZUT managed?
FLVI is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin International ex North America Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FLVI and ZUT emphasize?
FLVI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLVI or ZUT?
Year to date, FLVI has seen +$136.72 M in net flows, compared with -$94.91 M for ZUT. FLVI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLVI and ZUT compare?
FLVI has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of FLVI and ZUT?
FLVI's largest holdings include Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd., Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, and DBS Group Holdings Ltd.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLVI or ZUT?
FLVI holds 119 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, FLVI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLVI and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.