VS
When evaluating costs, FLX features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, FLX has returned 0.3% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 22.33% with +$700 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLX
HDIV
| AuM | $14.76 M | $2,014.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.29% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLX | +0.84% | -1.23% | -0.30% | +0.07% | +24.32% |
HDIV | +0.48% | +0.46% | +22.33% | +26.48% | +120.28% | |
| Flows | FLX | -$1 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$11 M |
HDIV | +$66 M | +$213 M | +$700 M | +$780 M | +$1,271 M |
FLX vs HDIV exposure
Countries
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FLX
HDIV
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.36% | 9.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 17, 2011 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FLX and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLX or HDIV?
As of November 11, 2026, FLX has returned -0.30% year to date, while HDIV has returned 22.33%. HDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLX or HDIV?
As of November 11, 2026, FLX manages $14.76 M in assets, while HDIV manages $2.01 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLX and HDIV managed?
FLX is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLX or HDIV?
Year to date, FLX has seen -$2.52 M in net flows, compared with +$700.01 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLX and HDIV compare?
FLX has an expense ratio of 1.29%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
Recent articles about FLX and HDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.