VS
Compare Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FMID) vs iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FMID provides Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while XMC.U is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, FMID features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.15% for XMC.U. Performance-wise, FMID has returned 12.52% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas XMC.U is at 11.58% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FMID
XMC.U
| AuM | $12.82 M | $40.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMID | +4.48% | +1.84% | +12.52% | +10.76% | - |
XMC.U | +1.07% | -3.43% | +11.58% | +11.62% | +62.64% | |
| Flows | FMID | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | - |
XMC.U | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | +$4 M | +$29 M |
FMID vs XMC.U exposure
Countries
FMID
USA
94.98%
XMC.U
USA
96.39%
Sectors
FMID
Finance
19.24%
Healthcare
15.73%
Industrials
13.91%
Technology
13.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.46%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.50%
Other
19.86%
XMC.U
Finance
22.77%
Industrials
16.32%
Technology
14.41%
Non-Energy Materials
10.55%
Healthcare
10.25%
Other
25.70%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FMID
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.37%
Paychex, Inc.
1.21%
The Allstate Corp.
1.18%
Garmin Ltd.
1.15%
Cencora, Inc.
1.14%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.12%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.09%
Fastenal Co.
1.08%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.05%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
1.05%
XMC.U
US4642875078
99.94%
Diversification
FMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 204 total
11.45%
XMC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
FMID
XMC.U
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD | S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 0.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 30, 2025 | October 22, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FMID and XMC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FMID or XMC.U?
As of October 27, 2026, FMID has returned 12.52% year to date, while XMC.U has returned 11.58%. FMID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FMID or XMC.U?
As of October 27, 2026, FMID manages $12.82 M in assets, while XMC.U manages $40.85 M. XMC.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FMID and XMC.U managed?
FMID is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XMC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: FMID or XMC.U?
FMID holds 201 securities, while XMC.U holds 1. On holdings count, FMID is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FMID or XMC.U?
Year to date, FMID has seen +$1.94 M in net flows, compared with +$5.34 M for XMC.U. XMC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FMID and XMC.U compare?
FMID has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while XMC.U has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What sectors do FMID and XMC.U emphasize?
FMID is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials. XMC.U is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about FMID and XMC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.