VS
When evaluating costs, FMPG features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FMPG has returned 15.05% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.41% with -$487 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FMPG
HBNK
| AuM | $10.69 M | $739.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMPG | +1.11% | +0.65% | +15.05% | - | - |
HBNK | -0.36% | -5.02% | +29.41% | +45.24% | +166.14% | |
| Flows | FMPG | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$9 M | - | - |
HBNK | -$4 M | -$24 M | -$487 M | -$533 M | -$189 M |
FMPG vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FMPG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.74%
Sectors
FMPG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.74%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FMPG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.21%
Bank of Montreal
16.52%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.70%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
FMPG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.74%
Characteristics
Compare
FMPG
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.68% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 1, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FMPG and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FMPG or HBNK?
As of October 16, 2026, FMPG has returned 15.05% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.41%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FMPG or HBNK?
As of October 16, 2026, FMPG manages $10.69 M in assets, while HBNK manages $739.96 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FMPG and HBNK managed?
FMPG is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FMPG or HBNK?
Year to date, FMPG has seen +$9.35 M in net flows, compared with -$486.68 M for HBNK. FMPG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FMPG and HBNK compare?
FMPG has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FMPG and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.