VS
When evaluating costs, FTHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FTHI has returned 12.57% year-to-date with +$38 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 30.39% with -$487 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FTHI
HBNK
| AuM | $86.96 M | $745.55 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.32% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTHI | -1.89% | +5.57% | +12.57% | +7.63% | - |
HBNK | +0.71% | -1.10% | +30.39% | +44.92% | +181.35% | |
| Flows | FTHI | +$3 M | +$6 M | +$38 M | +$45 M | - |
HBNK | -$4 M | +$5 M | -$487 M | -$542 M | -$211 M |
FTHI vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.74%
Sectors
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.74%
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.21%
Bank of Montreal
16.52%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.70%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
FTHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.74%
Characteristics
Compare
FTHI
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.18% | 2.66% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 16, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FTHI and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FTHI or HBNK?
As of October 23, 2026, FTHI has returned 12.57% year to date, while HBNK has returned 30.39%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FTHI or HBNK?
As of October 23, 2026, FTHI manages $86.96 M in assets, while HBNK manages $745.55 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FTHI and HBNK managed?
FTHI is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FTHI or HBNK?
Year to date, FTHI has seen +$37.93 M in net flows, compared with -$486.74 M for HBNK. FTHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FTHI and HBNK compare?
FTHI has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FTHI and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.