VS
When evaluating costs, GDXU features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, GDXU has returned 4.23% year-to-date with -$16 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.75% with -$481 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GDXU
HBNK
| AuM | $273.00 M | $749.00 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.35% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GDXU | -20.53% | +38.45% | -4.23% | +34.73% | +791.40% |
HBNK | +1.61% | -0.32% | +29.75% | +46.75% | +160.36% | |
| Flows | GDXU | +$2 M | +$3 M | -$16 M | -$24 M | -$164 M |
HBNK | +$32 M | -$52 M | -$481 M | -$592 M | -$111 M |
GDXU vs HBNK exposure
Countries
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
GDXU
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 25, 2007 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about GDXU and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GDXU or HBNK?
As of September 24, 2026, GDXU has returned -4.23% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.75%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GDXU or HBNK?
As of September 24, 2026, GDXU manages $273.00 M in assets, while HBNK manages $749.00 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GDXU and HBNK managed?
GDXU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GDXU or HBNK?
Year to date, GDXU has seen -$15.72 M in net flows, compared with -$481.29 M for HBNK. GDXU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GDXU and HBNK compare?
GDXU has an expense ratio of 1.35%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about GDXU and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.