VS
When evaluating costs, GRNI features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.45% for FCIV. Performance-wise, GRNI has returned 4.8% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas FCIV is at 18.52% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GRNI
FCIV
| AuM | $9.58 M | $2,661.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRNI | +1.54% | -6.31% | +4.80% | +3.24% | +55.48% |
FCIV | -0.46% | +0.83% | +18.52% | +25.05% | +88.21% | |
| Flows | GRNI | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | -$63 M |
FCIV | +$83 M | +$254 M | +$1,031 M | +$1,251 M | +$1,984 M |
GRNI vs FCIV exposure
Countries
GRNI
USA
41.38%
United Kingdom
10.00%
Spain
9.85%
Germany
7.08%
Other
31.70%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
GRNI
Utilities
59.25%
Industrials
24.85%
Business Services
14.02%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GRNI
SSE Plc
5.32%
Entergy Corp.
5.16%
Waste Management, Inc.
4.97%
Iberdrola SA
4.61%
Republic Services, Inc.
4.33%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.02%
Severn Trent Plc
3.20%
Hera SpA
3.18%
E.ON SE
3.16%
Prysmian SpA
3.13%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
GRNI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
41.09%
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
GRNI
FCIV
| Provider | BMO | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.84% | 2.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | March 1, 2022 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about GRNI and FCIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GRNI or FCIV?
As of October 16, 2026, GRNI has returned 4.80% year to date, while FCIV has returned 18.52%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GRNI or FCIV?
As of October 16, 2026, GRNI manages $9.58 M in assets, while FCIV manages $2.66 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GRNI and FCIV managed?
GRNI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GRNI or FCIV?
Year to date, GRNI has seen +$2.04 M in net flows, compared with +$1,031.03 M for FCIV. FCIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GRNI and FCIV compare?
GRNI has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about GRNI and FCIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.