VS
Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA) and CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HBA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, while FSF leans towards Finance, Technology, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, HBA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.85% for FSF. Performance-wise, HBA has returned 5.68% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas FSF is at 2.45% with +$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBA
FSF
| AuM | $135.01 M | $108.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.70% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBA | +3.95% | -1.64% | +5.68% | +2.43% | +74.67% |
FSF | -2.89% | -5.30% | +2.45% | +8.34% | +87.42% | |
| Flows | HBA | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$6 M | -$5 M | -$34 M |
FSF | -$4 M | -$195 M | +$8 M | -$459 M | -$587 M |
HBA vs FSF exposure
Countries
HBA
Australia
101.15%
FSF
USA
55.64%
Other
44.36%
Sectors
HBA
Finance
101.15%
FSF
Finance
93.62%
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBA
Macquarie Group Ltd.
25.68%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
20.32%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
20.11%
Westpac Banking Corp.
17.76%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
17.28%
FSF
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
6.01%
Bank of America Corp.
4.97%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.88%
Visa, Inc.
4.18%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.85%
UniCredit SpA
3.50%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
3.21%
Royal Bank of Canada
3.11%
BlackRock, Inc.
2.98%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.93%
Diversification
HBA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
101.15%
FSF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 45 total
39.62%
Characteristics
Compare
HBA
FSF
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.02% | 1.30% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | November 18, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about HBA and FSF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBA or FSF?
As of October 26, 2026, HBA has returned 5.68% year to date, while FSF has returned 2.45%. HBA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBA or FSF?
As of October 26, 2026, HBA manages $135.01 M in assets, while FSF manages $108.30 M. HBA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBA and FSF managed?
HBA is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUD benchmark. FSF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do HBA and FSF emphasize?
HBA is most exposed to Finance. FSF is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBA or FSF?
Year to date, HBA has seen -$6.02 M in net flows, compared with +$7.87 M for FSF. FSF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBA and FSF compare?
HBA has an expense ratio of 0.70%, while FSF has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of HBA and FSF?
HBA's largest holdings include Macquarie Group Ltd., ANZ Group Holdings Ltd., and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. FSF's top holdings include JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., and Mastercard, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HBA or FSF?
HBA holds 5 securities, while FSF holds 45. On holdings count, FSF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HBA and FSF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.