HBA
Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HBA fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HBA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, while XIC leans towards Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, HBA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, HBA has returned 5.09% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.04% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HBA
+3.37%-2.19%+5.09%+1.85%+73.04%
XIC
+2.09%+2.21%+16.04%+22.08%+108.73%
Flows
HBA
-$1 M-$1 M-$6 M-$5 M-$34 M
XIC
+$1,089 M+$4,543 M+$11,264 M+$12,310 M+$17,403 M

HBA vs XIC exposure

Countries

HBA
Australia
101.15%
XIC
Canada
96.58%

Sectors

HBA
Finance
101.15%
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HBA
Macquarie Group Ltd.
25.68%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
20.32%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
20.11%
Westpac Banking Corp.
17.76%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
17.28%
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%

Diversification

HBA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
101.15%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%

Characteristics

Compare
HBA
XIC
ProviderHamilton ETFsiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUDS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.04%1.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 29, 2020February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about HBA and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBA or XIC?
As of October 27, 2026, HBA has returned 5.09% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.04%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBA or XIC?
As of October 27, 2026, HBA manages $134.25 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.88 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBA and XIC managed?
HBA is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight GTR Index - AUD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HBA and XIC emphasize?
HBA is most exposed to Finance. XIC is most exposed to Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBA or XIC?
Year to date, HBA has seen -$6.02 M in net flows, compared with +$11,263.93 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBA and XIC compare?
HBA has an expense ratio of 0.70%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of HBA and XIC?
HBA's largest holdings include Macquarie Group Ltd., ANZ Group Holdings Ltd., and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. XIC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HBA or XIC?
HBA holds 5 securities, while XIC holds 217. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HBA and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds