HBGD
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF

Full HBGD fund page
VS
MTRX
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF

Full MTRX fund page

When evaluating costs, HBGD features a management fee (MER) of 0.59%, compared to 0.49% for MTRX. Performance-wise, HBGD has returned 57.98% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas MTRX is at 25.11% with +$37 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-5051015%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HBGD
-2.14%+47.61%+57.98%+133.77%+307.52%
MTRX
-6.62%+7.96%+25.11%+66.01%-
Flows
HBGD
+$4 M+$5 M+$3 M+$9 M+$10 M
MTRX
+$6 M+$16 M+$37 M+$44 M-

HBGD vs MTRX exposure

Countries

HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
MTRX
USA
39.74%
Ireland
11.35%
Canada
9.98%
Other
8.15%
Taiwan
7.57%
Other
23.21%

Sectors

HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
MTRX
Industrials
36.31%
Materials
20.13%
Information Technology
16.53%
Other
14.46%
Energy
7.76%
As of June 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
MTRX
DELTA ELECTRONIC
6.44%
US36828A1016
6.31%
VERTIV HOLDINGS
5.18%
CAMECO
5.08%
ARISTA NETWORKS
4.88%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION
4.63%
ABB
4.59%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
4.57%
EATON CORP PLC
4.43%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
4.42%

Diversification

HBGD
Exposure data will be available soon
MTRX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
50.53%

Characteristics

Compare
HBGD
MTRX
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USDMirae Asset AI Infrastructure Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.25%0.03%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 21, 2018February 20, 2025

Frequently asked questions about HBGD and MTRX

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBGD or MTRX?
As of June 10, 2026, HBGD has returned 57.98% year to date, while MTRX has returned 25.11%. HBGD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBGD or MTRX?
As of June 10, 2026, HBGD manages $58.61 M in assets, while MTRX manages $51.25 M. HBGD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBGD and MTRX managed?
HBGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD benchmark. MTRX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBGD or MTRX?
Year to date, HBGD has seen +$2.54 M in net flows, compared with +$36.92 M for MTRX. MTRX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBGD and MTRX compare?
HBGD has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while MTRX has an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Recent articles about HBGD and MTRX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds