VS
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HBGD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology and Finance, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, HBGD features a management fee (MER) of 0.59%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HBGD has returned 31.02% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 28.36% with +$125 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBGD
ZEB
| AuM | $47.32 M | $6,880.39 M |
| Management Fees | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.59% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBGD | -20.35% | -7.48% | +31.02% | +18.78% | +244.50% |
ZEB | -3.81% | -3.23% | +28.36% | +43.11% | +169.08% | |
| Flows | HBGD | -$4 M | -$4 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M |
ZEB | -$473 M | -$141 M | +$125 M | +$824 M | -$825 M |
HBGD vs ZEB exposure
Countries
HBGD
USA
52.86%
Taiwan
14.68%
Other
32.46%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
HBGD
Technology
58.55%
Finance
36.95%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBGD
Global Unichip Corp.
3.27%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
2.90%
Sharplink, Inc.
2.69%
Hashkey Holdings Ltd.
2.56%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
2.48%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
2.46%
Getac Holdings Corp.
2.43%
Oracle Corp.
2.43%
Bullish
2.41%
Winbond Electronics Corp.
2.40%
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
HBGD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
26.03%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HBGD
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.30% | 2.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 21, 2018 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HBGD and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBGD or ZEB?
As of October 19, 2026, HBGD has returned 31.02% year to date, while ZEB has returned 28.36%. HBGD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBGD or ZEB?
As of October 19, 2026, HBGD manages $47.32 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.88 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBGD and ZEB managed?
HBGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware NTR Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HBGD and ZEB emphasize?
HBGD is most exposed to Technology and Finance. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBGD or ZEB?
Year to date, HBGD has seen +$1.21 M in net flows, compared with +$125.08 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBGD and ZEB compare?
HBGD has an expense ratio of 0.59%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HBGD and ZEB?
HBGD's largest holdings include Global Unichip Corp., Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc., and Sharplink, Inc.. ZEB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBGD or ZEB?
HBGD holds 47 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HBGD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HBGD and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.