VS
Compare Blockchain Technologies ETF (HBLK) vs BMO MSCI EAFE Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZDM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HBLK provides Finance and Technology exposures, while ZDM is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, HBLK features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.2% for ZDM. Performance-wise, HBLK has returned 1.9% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas ZDM is at 11.68% with +$280 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HBLK
ZDM
| AuM | $17.15 M | $1,986.11 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.98% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.92% | -1.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HBLK | -18.25% | -14.43% | -1.90% | -33.27% | +119.21% |
ZDM | -1.22% | -0.86% | +11.68% | +13.71% | +65.79% | |
| Flows | HBLK | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$3 M | -$6 M | -$18 M |
ZDM | +$15 M | +$82 M | +$280 M | +$326 M | +$902 M |
HBLK vs ZDM exposure
Countries
HBLK
USA
80.38%
Other
19.62%
ZDM
Japan
25.40%
United Kingdom
13.40%
Switzerland
8.98%
Germany
8.04%
France
7.92%
Australia
7.10%
Other
29.15%
Sectors
HBLK
Finance
67.51%
Technology
30.80%
ZDM
Finance
26.97%
Industrials
16.10%
Technology
12.64%
Healthcare
9.08%
Non-Energy Materials
7.82%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.69%
Other
19.70%
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HBLK
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
7.86%
Coinbase Global, Inc.
7.70%
Block, Inc.
7.51%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
7.41%
IREN Ltd.
6.63%
Hut 8 Corp.
5.67%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
4.70%
Galaxy Digital, Inc.
4.44%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
3.75%
Core Scientific, Inc.
3.40%
ZDM
CA05579E1097
99.50%
Diversification
HBLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 43 total
59.06%
ZDM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,627 total
99.50%
Characteristics
Compare
HBLK
ZDM
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Harvest Blockchain Technologies GTR Index - CAD | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 7, 2018 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HBLK and ZDM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBLK or ZDM?
As of October 26, 2026, HBLK has returned -1.90% year to date, while ZDM has returned 11.68%. ZDM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBLK or ZDM?
As of October 26, 2026, HBLK manages $17.15 M in assets, while ZDM manages $1.99 B. ZDM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBLK and ZDM managed?
HBLK is passively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It tracks the Harvest Blockchain Technologies GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZDM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBLK or ZDM?
HBLK holds 43 securities, while ZDM holds 1. On holdings count, HBLK is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBLK or ZDM?
Year to date, HBLK has seen -$3.24 M in net flows, compared with +$279.53 M for ZDM. ZDM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBLK and ZDM compare?
HBLK has an expense ratio of 0.98%, while ZDM has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What sectors do HBLK and ZDM emphasize?
HBLK is most exposed to Finance and Technology. ZDM is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about HBLK and ZDM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.