HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page
VS
RBNK
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF

Full RBNK fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) vs RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HBNK and RBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HBNK features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.29% for RBNK. Performance-wise, HBNK has returned 27.64% year-to-date with -$514 M in net flows, whereas RBNK is at 28.31% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HBNK
-3.83%+7.77%+27.64%+57.01%+153.76%
RBNK
-3.67%+8.36%+28.31%+58.18%+156.00%
Flows
HBNK
-$52 M-$81 M-$514 M-$869 M-$77 M
RBNK
+$5 M+$17 M+$22 M+$31 M-$4 M

HBNK vs RBNK exposure

Countries

HBNK
Canada
99.94%
RBNK
Canada
99.95%

Sectors

HBNK
Finance
99.94%
RBNK
Finance
99.95%
As of August 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%
RBNK
Bank of Montreal
26.07%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
25.09%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.45%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.62%
National Bank of Canada
7.83%

Diversification

HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
RBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.95%

Characteristics

Compare
HBNK
RBNK
ProviderGlobal XRBC Global Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.67%2.82%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 5, 2023October 20, 2017

Frequently asked questions about HBNK and RBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HBNK or RBNK?
As of August 20, 2026, HBNK has returned 27.64% year to date, while RBNK has returned 28.31%. RBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HBNK or RBNK?
As of August 20, 2026, HBNK manages $706.91 M in assets, while RBNK manages $495.96 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HBNK and RBNK managed?
HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. RBNK is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HBNK and RBNK emphasize?
HBNK is most exposed to Finance. RBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HBNK or RBNK?
Year to date, HBNK has seen -$513.54 M in net flows, compared with +$21.98 M for RBNK. RBNK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HBNK and RBNK compare?
HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%, while RBNK has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of HBNK and RBNK?
HBNK's largest holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal. RBNK's top holdings include Bank of Montreal, The Bank of Nova Scotia, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: HBNK or RBNK?
HBNK holds 6 securities, while RBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HBNK is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HBNK and RBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds