VS
When evaluating costs, HCA features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.65% for HCAL. Performance-wise, HCA has returned 12.14% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas HCAL is at 14.52% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HCA
HCAL
| AuM | $91.53 M | $890.65 M |
| Management Fees | 0.29% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 2.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.99% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HCA | +12.33% | +11.96% | +12.14% | +63.57% | +110.23% |
HCAL | +15.84% | +13.55% | +14.52% | +81.71% | +142.39% | |
| Flows | HCA | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$6 M | -$40 M |
HCAL | +$7 M | -$1 M | +$1 M | -$28 M | +$13 M |
HCA vs HCAL exposure
Countries
HCA
Canada
100.10%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HCA
Financials
100.10%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HCA
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
28.60%
BANK OF MONTREAL
26.20%
ROYAL BK CANADA
25.70%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
6.80%
TORONTO DOMINION
6.60%
BNS
6.20%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HCA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.10%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HCA
HCAL
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.10% | 3.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | October 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HCA and HCAL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HCA or HCAL?
As of April 29, 2026, HCA has returned 12.14% year to date, while HCAL has returned 14.52%. HCAL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HCA or HCAL?
As of April 29, 2026, HCA manages $91.53 M in assets, while HCAL manages $890.65 M. HCAL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HCA and HCAL managed?
HCA is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HCAL is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HCA or HCAL?
Year to date, HCA has seen -$0.71 M in net flows, compared with +$1.05 M for HCAL. HCAL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HCA and HCAL compare?
HCA has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while HCAL has an expense ratio of 2.08%.
Recent articles about HCA and HCAL
How Inverse and Leveraged ETFs Work: Use Cases, Risks and ETFs to Consider
Short-term traders can use Inverse and Leveraged ETFs strategically, but these complex instruments require careful handling. Let's explore how they work and share some examples you can consider.
Posted on 7/3/2024 by Kyle Anthony inAsset classes
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.