VS
When evaluating costs, HCA features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.65% for HCAL. Performance-wise, HCA has returned 32.74% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas HCAL is at 37.33% with -$39 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HCA
HCAL
| AuM | $102.78 M | $1,013.40 M |
| Management Fees | 0.29% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.82% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.88% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HCA | -4.60% | +3.78% | +32.74% | +50.19% | +150.21% |
HCAL | -5.76% | +4.10% | +37.33% | +62.46% | +202.04% | |
| Flows | HCA | -$2 M | -$3 M | -$5 M | -$8 M | -$39 M |
HCAL | -$31 M | -$43 M | -$39 M | -$44 M | -$60 M |
HCA vs HCAL exposure
Countries
HCA
Canada
99.71%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HCA
Finance
99.71%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HCA
The Bank of Nova Scotia
26.43%
National Bank of Canada
21.45%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
21.43%
Bank of Montreal
11.93%
Royal Bank of Canada
11.89%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.58%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HCA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.71%
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HCA
HCAL
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.70% | 3.25% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | October 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HCA and HCAL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HCA or HCAL?
As of September 14, 2026, HCA has returned 32.74% year to date, while HCAL has returned 37.33%. HCAL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HCA or HCAL?
As of September 14, 2026, HCA manages $102.78 M in assets, while HCAL manages $1.01 B. HCAL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HCA and HCAL managed?
HCA is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HCAL is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HCA or HCAL?
Year to date, HCA has seen -$4.84 M in net flows, compared with -$38.93 M for HCAL. HCA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HCA and HCAL compare?
HCA has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while HCAL has an expense ratio of 0.82%.
Recent articles about HCA and HCAL
How Inverse and Leveraged ETFs Work: Use Cases, Risks and ETFs to Consider
Short-term traders can use Inverse and Leveraged ETFs strategically, but these complex instruments require careful handling. Let's explore how they work and share some examples you can consider.
Posted on 7/3/2024 by Kyle Anthony inAsset classes
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.