VS
When evaluating costs, HDIF features a management fee (MER) of 0%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, HDIF has returned 16.32% year-to-date with +$62 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 20.52% with +$480 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HDIF
HDIV
| AuM | $572.72 M | $1,813.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 2.08% | 2.55% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HDIF | +2.66% | +11.13% | +16.32% | +28.91% | +67.09% |
HDIV | +1.31% | +10.12% | +20.52% | +42.48% | +112.68% | |
| Flows | HDIF | +$13 M | +$29 M | +$62 M | +$64 M | +$146 M |
HDIV | +$75 M | +$185 M | +$480 M | +$706 M | +$1,066 M |
HDIF vs HDIV exposure
Countries
HDIF
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Other
35.14%
Canada
33.76%
USA
28.21%
Sectors
HDIF
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Other
35.14%
Finance
19.76%
Energy
14.11%
Technology
11.05%
Non-Energy Materials
11.04%
Other
8.89%
As of August 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HDIF
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
CA4073641082
20.20%
CA40736C1005
6.60%
Royal Bank of Canada
4.44%
CA40737J1049
3.55%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
3.08%
Bank of Montreal
1.90%
CA40736A1049
1.75%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
1.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.63%
Brookfield Corp.
1.60%
Diversification
HDIF
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 94 total
46.40%
Characteristics
Compare
HDIF
HDIV
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.31% | 9.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 4, 2022 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HDIF and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HDIF or HDIV?
As of August 4, 2026, HDIF has returned 16.32% year to date, while HDIV has returned 20.52%. HDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HDIF or HDIV?
As of August 4, 2026, HDIF manages $572.72 M in assets, while HDIV manages $1.81 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HDIF and HDIV managed?
HDIF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HDIF or HDIV?
Year to date, HDIF has seen +$62.47 M in net flows, compared with +$479.78 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HDIF and HDIV compare?
HDIF has an expense ratio of 2.08%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 2.55%.
Recent articles about HDIF and HDIV
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.