VS
When evaluating costs, HDIV features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HDIV has returned 18.68% year-to-date with +$366 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 26.79% with -$967 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HDIV
ZEB
| AuM | $1,700.69 M | $5,815.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 2.55% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HDIV | +5.12% | +14.62% | +18.68% | +47.18% | +109.90% |
ZEB | +9.00% | +23.92% | +26.79% | +69.75% | +145.68% | |
| Flows | HDIV | +$59 M | +$167 M | +$366 M | +$670 M | +$955 M |
ZEB | +$248 M | -$20 M | -$967 M | -$819 M | -$1,710 M |
HDIV vs ZEB exposure
Countries
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HDIV
ZEB
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.14% | 2.38% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 19, 2021 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HDIV and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HDIV or ZEB?
As of June 16, 2026, HDIV has returned 18.68% year to date, while ZEB has returned 26.79%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HDIV or ZEB?
As of June 16, 2026, HDIV manages $1.70 B in assets, while ZEB manages $5.82 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HDIV and ZEB managed?
HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HDIV or ZEB?
Year to date, HDIV has seen +$366.41 M in net flows, compared with -$966.71 M for ZEB. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HDIV and ZEB compare?
HDIV has an expense ratio of 2.55%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about HDIV and ZEB
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.