HEB
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Compare HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEB and HBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HEB has returned 36.18% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 36.26% with -$509 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEB
+6.59%+2.53%+36.18%+49.26%+180.31%
HBNK
+6.59%+2.56%+36.26%+49.34%+181.11%
Flows
HEB
-$24 M-$98 M-$14 M+$32 M+$49 M
HBNK
-$28 M+$7 M-$509 M-$579 M-$287 M

HEB vs HBNK exposure

Countries

HEB
Canada
99.94%
HBNK
Canada
99.73%

Sectors

HEB
Finance
99.94%
HBNK
Finance
99.73%
As of November 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.13%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.74%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.54%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.50%
National Bank of Canada
16.00%
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.08%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.77%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.48%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.43%
National Bank of Canada
15.95%

Diversification

HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.73%

Characteristics

Compare
HEB
HBNK
ProviderHamilton ETFsGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.61%2.57%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 3, 2023July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HEB and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEB or HBNK?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB has returned 36.18% year to date, while HBNK has returned 36.26%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEB or HBNK?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB manages $1.37 B in assets, while HBNK manages $754.34 M. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEB and HBNK managed?
HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEB and HBNK emphasize?
HEB is most exposed to Finance. HBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEB or HBNK?
Year to date, HEB has seen -$13.63 M in net flows, compared with -$509.29 M for HBNK. HEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEB and HBNK compare?
HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of HEB and HBNK?
HEB's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal. HBNK's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEB or HBNK?
HEB holds 6 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEB and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds