HEB
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEB and HEWB provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, HEB has returned 36.18% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 35.99% with +$38 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEB
+6.59%+2.53%+36.18%+49.26%+180.31%
HEWB
+6.59%+2.48%+35.99%+48.98%+179.35%
Flows
HEB
-$24 M-$98 M-$14 M+$32 M+$49 M
HEWB
+$7 M+$11 M+$38 M+$38 M+$38 M

HEB vs HEWB exposure

Countries

HEB
Canada
99.94%
HEWB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HEB
Finance
99.94%
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of November 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.13%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.74%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.54%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.50%
National Bank of Canada
16.00%
HEWB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.14%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.99%
Bank of Montreal
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.49%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.45%
National Bank of Canada
16.14%

Diversification

HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HEB
HEWB
ProviderHamilton ETFsGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.61%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 3, 2023January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about HEB and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEB or HEWB?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB has returned 36.18% year to date, while HEWB has returned 35.99%. HEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEB or HEWB?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB manages $1.37 B in assets, while HEWB manages $370.10 M. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEB and HEWB managed?
HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEB and HEWB emphasize?
HEB is most exposed to Finance. HEWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEB or HEWB?
Year to date, HEB has seen -$13.63 M in net flows, compared with +$38.16 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEB and HEWB compare?
HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HEB and HEWB?
HEB's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal. HEWB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEB or HEWB?
HEB holds 6 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, HEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEB and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds