HEB
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page
VS
HFN
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Financials Index ETF

Full HFN fund page

Compare HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) vs HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Financials Index ETF (HFN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEB and HFN provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.19% for HFN. Performance-wise, HEB has returned 32.06% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas HFN is at 21.84% with +$190 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEB
+3.37%-1.15%+32.06%+44.55%+171.84%
HFN
+3.87%-1.84%+21.84%+31.84%-
Flows
HEB
-$18 M-$91 M-$7 M+$37 M+$55 M
HFN
+$15 M+$44 M+$190 M+$218 M-

HEB vs HFN exposure

Countries

HEB
Canada
99.94%
HFN
Canada
99.71%

Sectors

HEB
Finance
99.94%
HFN
Finance
99.71%
As of November 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.13%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.74%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.54%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.50%
National Bank of Canada
16.00%
HFN
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
9.46%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
9.45%
Bank of Montreal
8.87%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
8.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.82%
Manulife Financial Corp.
8.76%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.71%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
8.09%
National Bank of Canada
7.72%
Intact Financial Corp.
7.24%

Diversification

HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
HFN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
85.97%

Characteristics

Compare
HEB
HFN
ProviderHamilton ETFsHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Canadian Financials Equal-Weight TR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.70%2.49%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 3, 2023January 20, 2025

Frequently asked questions about HEB and HFN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEB or HFN?
As of November 5, 2026, HEB has returned 32.06% year to date, while HFN has returned 21.84%. HEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEB or HFN?
As of November 5, 2026, HEB manages $1.33 B in assets, while HFN manages $395.26 M. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEB and HFN managed?
HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HFN is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Financials Equal-Weight TR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEB and HFN emphasize?
HEB is most exposed to Finance. HFN is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEB or HFN?
Year to date, HEB has seen -$7.50 M in net flows, compared with +$189.58 M for HFN. HFN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEB and HFN compare?
HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while HFN has an expense ratio of 0.04%.
What are the top holdings of HEB and HFN?
HEB's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal. HFN's top holdings include Great-West Lifeco, Inc., The Bank of Nova Scotia, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEB or HFN?
HEB holds 6 securities, while HFN holds 12. On holdings count, HFN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEB and HFN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds