HEB
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page
VS
RBNK
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF

Full RBNK fund page

Compare HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) vs RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HEB and RBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HEB features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.29% for RBNK. Performance-wise, HEB has returned 36.18% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas RBNK is at 38.25% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.0%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HEB
+6.59%+2.53%+36.18%+49.26%+180.31%
RBNK
+6.37%+3.43%+38.25%+50.06%+183.91%
Flows
HEB
-$24 M-$98 M-$14 M+$32 M+$49 M
RBNK
+$3 M-$3 M+$22 M+$28 M-$3 M

HEB vs RBNK exposure

Countries

HEB
Canada
99.94%
RBNK
Canada
99.92%

Sectors

HEB
Finance
99.94%
RBNK
Finance
99.92%
As of November 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.13%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.74%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.54%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.50%
National Bank of Canada
16.00%
RBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
26.91%
Bank of Montreal
24.19%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.97%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.13%
National Bank of Canada
7.63%

Diversification

HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
RBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.92%

Characteristics

Compare
HEB
RBNK
ProviderHamilton ETFsRBC Global Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CADSolactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.61%2.67%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 3, 2023October 20, 2017

Frequently asked questions about HEB and RBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HEB or RBNK?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB has returned 36.18% year to date, while RBNK has returned 38.25%. RBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HEB or RBNK?
As of November 4, 2026, HEB manages $1.37 B in assets, while RBNK manages $530.51 M. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HEB and RBNK managed?
HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. RBNK is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HEB and RBNK emphasize?
HEB is most exposed to Finance. RBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HEB or RBNK?
Year to date, HEB has seen -$13.63 M in net flows, compared with +$21.75 M for RBNK. RBNK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HEB and RBNK compare?
HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while RBNK has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of HEB and RBNK?
HEB's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal. RBNK's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEB or RBNK?
HEB holds 6 securities, while RBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HEB and RBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds