HFN
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Financials Index ETF

Full HFN fund page
VS
HEB
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF

Full HEB fund page

Compare HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Financials Index ETF (HFN) vs HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HFN and HEB provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, HFN features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.19% for HEB. Performance-wise, HFN has returned 25.26% year-to-date with +$192 M in net flows, whereas HEB is at 35.12% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HFN
+6.30%+2.17%+25.26%+35.02%-
HEB
+5.35%+1.64%+35.12%+46.09%+177.95%
Flows
HFN
+$18 M+$44 M+$192 M+$220 M-
HEB
-$2 M-$88 M-$8 M+$40 M+$48 M

HFN vs HEB exposure

Countries

HFN
Canada
99.71%
HEB
Canada
99.94%

Sectors

HFN
Finance
99.71%
HEB
Finance
99.94%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HFN
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
9.46%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
9.45%
Bank of Montreal
8.87%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
8.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.82%
Manulife Financial Corp.
8.76%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.71%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
8.09%
National Bank of Canada
7.72%
Intact Financial Corp.
7.24%
HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.13%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.74%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.54%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.50%
National Bank of Canada
16.00%

Diversification

HFN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
85.97%
HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%

Characteristics

Compare
HFN
HEB
ProviderHamilton ETFsHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Canadian Financials Equal-Weight TR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.42%2.64%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 20, 2025April 3, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HFN and HEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HFN or HEB?
As of November 11, 2026, HFN has returned 25.26% year to date, while HEB has returned 35.12%. HEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HFN or HEB?
As of November 11, 2026, HFN manages $408.89 M in assets, while HEB manages $1.36 B. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HFN and HEB managed?
HFN is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Financials Equal-Weight TR Index - CAD benchmark. HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HFN and HEB emphasize?
HFN is most exposed to Finance. HEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HFN or HEB?
Year to date, HFN has seen +$192.06 M in net flows, compared with -$7.53 M for HEB. HFN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HFN and HEB compare?
HFN has an expense ratio of 0.04%, while HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%.
What are the top holdings of HFN and HEB?
HFN's largest holdings include Great-West Lifeco, Inc., The Bank of Nova Scotia, and Bank of Montreal. HEB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: HFN or HEB?
HFN holds 12 securities, while HEB holds 6. On holdings count, HFN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HFN and HEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds