HIND
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF

Full HIND fund page
VS
ZXLI
BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLI fund page

Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) and BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HIND focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, while ZXLI leans towards Industrials and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, HIND features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLI. Performance-wise, HIND has returned 12.78% year-to-date with +$25 M in net flows, whereas ZXLI is at 15.07% with +$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HIND
+2.84%+4.99%+12.78%+23.39%-
ZXLI
+2.11%+6.40%+15.07%+25.40%-
Flows
HIND
+$7 M+$15 M+$25 M+$39 M-
ZXLI
-$1 M-$7 M+$15 M+$17 M-

HIND vs ZXLI exposure

Countries

HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%
ZXLI
USA
92.73%
Ireland
7.19%

Sectors

HIND
Industrials
95.60%
ZXLI
Industrials
91.43%
Other
8.57%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HIND
US36828A1016
5.20%
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%
ZXLI
CATERPILLAR
7.61%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.59%
US36828A1016
5.36%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
4.34%
BOEING U
3.30%
EATON CORP PLC
3.09%
UNION PACIFIC U
2.94%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.82%
DEERE
2.73%
HONEYWELL INTL
2.50%

Diversification

HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%
ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 79 total
40.28%

Characteristics

Compare
HIND
ZXLI
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.86%1.81%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 15, 2024February 2, 2025

Frequently asked questions about HIND and ZXLI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HIND or ZXLI?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND has returned 12.78% year to date, while ZXLI has returned 15.07%. ZXLI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HIND or ZXLI?
As of June 11, 2026, HIND manages $102.00 M in assets, while ZXLI manages $23.71 M. HIND is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HIND and ZXLI managed?
HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do HIND and ZXLI emphasize?
HIND is most exposed to Industrials. ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HIND or ZXLI?
Year to date, HIND has seen +$25.20 M in net flows, compared with +$15.46 M for ZXLI. HIND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HIND and ZXLI compare?
HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of HIND and ZXLI?
HIND's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZXLI's top holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC.
Which ETF is more diversified: HIND or ZXLI?
HIND holds 20 securities, while ZXLI holds 77. On holdings count, ZXLI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HIND and ZXLI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds