VS
When evaluating costs, HLIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, HLIF has returned 19.4% year-to-date with +$52 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 20.86% with +$572 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HLIF
HDIV
| AuM | $205.29 M | $1,894.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.79% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HLIF | -1.92% | +1.65% | +19.40% | +30.17% | +78.53% |
HDIV | -1.96% | +1.83% | +20.86% | +33.09% | +109.74% | |
| Flows | HLIF | +$11 M | +$31 M | +$52 M | +$54 M | +$58 M |
HDIV | +$75 M | +$206 M | +$572 M | +$738 M | +$1,151 M |
HLIF vs HDIV exposure
Countries
HLIF
Canada
90.40%
USA
9.47%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HLIF
Finance
40.32%
Energy
23.67%
Utilities
12.64%
Other
23.37%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HLIF
Thomson Reuters Corp.
4.09%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.83%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.65%
IGM Financial, Inc.
3.61%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.54%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.52%
Power Corp of Canada
3.49%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.43%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
3.40%
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
3.37%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HLIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
35.92%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HLIF
HDIV
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.26% | 9.46% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 13, 2022 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HLIF and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HLIF or HDIV?
As of September 16, 2026, HLIF has returned 19.40% year to date, while HDIV has returned 20.86%. HDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HLIF or HDIV?
As of September 16, 2026, HLIF manages $205.29 M in assets, while HDIV manages $1.89 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HLIF and HDIV managed?
HLIF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HLIF or HDIV?
Year to date, HLIF has seen +$51.95 M in net flows, compared with +$571.70 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HLIF and HDIV compare?
HLIF has an expense ratio of 0.79%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
Recent articles about HLIF and HDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.