VS
When evaluating costs, HLIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, HLIF has returned 10.85% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 10.2% with +$264 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HLIF
HDIV
| AuM | $156.97 M | $1,504.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.79% | 2.55% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HLIF | +4.07% | +8.15% | +10.85% | +38.58% | +62.02% |
HDIV | +8.25% | +5.43% | +10.20% | +49.51% | +91.99% | |
| Flows | HLIF | -$0 M | +$9 M | +$11 M | +$0 M | +$26 M |
HDIV | +$55 M | +$182 M | +$264 M | +$607 M | +$870 M |
HLIF vs HDIV exposure
Countries
HLIF
Canada
93.00%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HLIF
Financials
33.20%
Energy
19.80%
Materials
10.50%
Other
10.30%
Utilities
9.80%
Other
16.40%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HLIF
BARRICK GOLD
3.60%
LUNDIN GOLD INC
3.60%
MAGNA INTERNATIONAL
3.50%
IGM FINANCIAL
3.40%
CENOVUS ENERGY
3.40%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.40%
TORONTO DOMINION
3.40%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
3.40%
MANULIFE-S
3.30%
FORTIS
3.30%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HLIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
34.30%
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HLIF
HDIV
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.07% | 9.55% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 13, 2022 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HLIF and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HLIF or HDIV?
As of April 23, 2026, HLIF has returned 10.85% year to date, while HDIV has returned 10.20%. HLIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HLIF or HDIV?
As of April 23, 2026, HLIF manages $156.97 M in assets, while HDIV manages $1.50 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HLIF and HDIV managed?
HLIF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HLIF or HDIV?
Year to date, HLIF has seen +$10.99 M in net flows, compared with +$263.68 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HLIF and HDIV compare?
HLIF has an expense ratio of 0.79%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 2.55%.
Recent articles about HLIF and HDIV
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.