VS
When evaluating costs, HMAX features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.11% for CASH. Performance-wise, HMAX has returned 7.26% year-to-date with +$231 M in net flows, whereas CASH is at 0.68% with +$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HMAX
CASH
| AuM | $2,239.25 M | $6,702.88 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HMAX | +7.70% | +6.47% | +7.26% | +37.72% | +69.53% |
CASH | +0.17% | +0.49% | +0.68% | +2.28% | +11.56% | |
| Flows | HMAX | +$11 M | +$142 M | +$231 M | +$677 M | +$1,697 M |
CASH | -$150 M | -$46 M | +$62 M | +$165 M | +$4,287 M |
HMAX vs CASH exposure
Countries
HMAX
Canada
101.40%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HMAX
Financials
90.60%
Other
9.40%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
As of May 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HMAX
ROYAL BK CANADA
24.50%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.00%
CA11271J1075
10.80%
BANK OF MONTREAL
10.40%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
9.50%
BNS
9.30%
MANULIFE-S
6.30%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
5.50%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
4.60%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.50%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
101.40%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HMAX
CASH
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 11.88% | 2.24% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2023 | November 2, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HMAX and CASH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HMAX or CASH?
As of May 1, 2026, HMAX has returned 7.26% year to date, while CASH has returned 0.68%. HMAX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HMAX or CASH?
As of May 1, 2026, HMAX manages $2.24 B in assets, while CASH manages $6.70 B. CASH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HMAX and CASH managed?
HMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HMAX or CASH?
Year to date, HMAX has seen +$230.93 M in net flows, compared with +$61.84 M for CASH. HMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HMAX and CASH compare?
HMAX has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about HMAX and CASH
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.