HMAX
Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF

Full HMAX fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HMAX focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HMAX features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HMAX has returned 6.15% year-to-date with +$197 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 12.82% with -$917 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HMAX
+8.49%+5.76%+6.15%+38.66%+69.64%
ZEB
+11.34%+12.03%+12.82%+67.83%+114.74%
Flows
HMAX
+$3 M+$143 M+$197 M+$658 M+$1,694 M
ZEB
-$186 M-$913 M-$917 M-$2,240 M-$1,205 M

HMAX vs ZEB exposure

Countries

HMAX
Canada
101.40%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HMAX
Financials
90.60%
Other
9.40%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HMAX
ROYAL BK CANADA
24.50%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.00%
CA11271J1075
10.80%
BANK OF MONTREAL
10.40%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
9.50%
BNS
9.30%
MANULIFE-S
6.30%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
5.50%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
4.60%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.50%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%

Diversification

HMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
101.40%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HMAX
ZEB
ProviderHamilton ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield11.88%2.66%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 20, 2023October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about HMAX and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HMAX or ZEB?
As of April 24, 2026, HMAX has returned 6.15% year to date, while ZEB has returned 12.82%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HMAX or ZEB?
As of April 24, 2026, HMAX manages $2.20 B in assets, while ZEB manages $5.27 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HMAX and ZEB managed?
HMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HMAX and ZEB emphasize?
HMAX is most exposed to Financials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HMAX or ZEB?
Year to date, HMAX has seen +$197.26 M in net flows, compared with -$917.23 M for ZEB. HMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HMAX and ZEB compare?
HMAX has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HMAX and ZEB?
HMAX's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HMAX or ZEB?
HMAX holds 10 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HMAX is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HMAX and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds