HNU
BetaPro Natural Gas 2x Daily Bull ETF - CAD

Full HNU fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, HNU features a management fee (MER) of 1.34%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HNU has returned 37% year-to-date with -$127 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 25.35% with -$415 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HNU
+1.96%-32.65%-37.00%-66.65%-92.83%
HBNK
+8.46%+23.65%+25.35%+68.05%-
Flows
HNU
-$45 M+$56 M-$127 M+$29 M-$18 M
HBNK
+$31 M-$184 M-$415 M-$667 M-

HNU vs HBNK exposure

Countries

HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%

Sectors

HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%

Diversification

HNU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%

Characteristics

Compare
HNU
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkHorizons Natural Gas Rolling Futures Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassCommodityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.67%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 15, 2008July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HNU and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HNU or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, HNU has returned -37.00% year to date, while HBNK has returned 25.35%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HNU or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, HNU manages $175.86 M in assets, while HBNK manages $791.30 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HNU and HBNK managed?
HNU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Horizons Natural Gas Rolling Futures Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HNU or HBNK?
Year to date, HNU has seen -$126.55 M in net flows, compared with -$414.83 M for HBNK. HNU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HNU and HBNK compare?
HNU has an expense ratio of 1.38%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about HNU and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds