VS
When evaluating costs, HPYT features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.15% for ZTIP.F. Performance-wise, HPYT has returned 3.05% year-to-date with -$133 M in net flows, whereas ZTIP.F is at 0.11% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HPYT
ZTIP.F
| AuM | $268.11 M | $242.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.69% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HPYT | -0.24% | -3.57% | -3.05% | -3.14% | -0.48% |
ZTIP.F | -1.05% | -0.61% | -0.11% | -0.35% | +10.08% | |
| Flows | HPYT | -$21 M | -$52 M | -$133 M | -$176 M | +$464 M |
ZTIP.F | +$1 M | -$2 M | +$55 M | +$64 M | +$74 M |
HPYT vs ZTIP.F exposure
Countries
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZTIP.F
USA
100.00%
Sectors
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZTIP.F
Sovereign
100.00%
As of September 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZTIP.F
USA, TIPS 1.125% 15oct2030, USD (AE-2030)
5.67%
USA, TIPS 1.25% 15apr2031, USD (X-2031)
5.62%
USA, TIPS 1.625% 15apr2030, USD (X-2030)
5.59%
USA, TIPS 1.625% 15oct2029, USD (AE-2029)
5.41%
USA, TIPS 2.125% 15apr2029, USD (X-2029)
5.26%
USA, TIPS 2.375% 15oct2028, USD (AE-2028)
5.21%
USA, TIPS 0.125% 15apr2027, USD (X-2027)
5.03%
USA, TIPS 1.625% 15oct2027, USD (AE-2027)
5.01%
USA, TIPS 0.125% 15oct2026, USD (AE-2026)
4.93%
USA, TIPS 1.25% 15apr2028, USD (X-2028)
4.89%
Diversification
HPYT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZTIP.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
52.62%
Characteristics
Compare
HPYT
ZTIP.F
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg US Govt Inflation-Linked 0-5Yrs Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 16.00% | 3.98% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 28, 2023 | January 20, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about HPYT and ZTIP.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HPYT or ZTIP.F?
As of September 22, 2026, HPYT has returned -3.05% year to date, while ZTIP.F has returned -0.11%. ZTIP.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HPYT or ZTIP.F?
As of September 22, 2026, HPYT manages $268.11 M in assets, while ZTIP.F manages $242.78 M. HPYT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HPYT and ZTIP.F managed?
HPYT is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZTIP.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Bloomberg US Govt Inflation-Linked 0-5Yrs Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HPYT or ZTIP.F?
Year to date, HPYT has seen -$132.99 M in net flows, compared with +$54.58 M for ZTIP.F. ZTIP.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HPYT and ZTIP.F compare?
HPYT has an expense ratio of 0.69%, while ZTIP.F has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about HPYT and ZTIP.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.