VS
When evaluating costs, HSAV features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.15% for PSA. Performance-wise, HSAV has returned 1.49% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas PSA is at 1.79% with +$152 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HSAV
PSA
| AuM | $1,936.46 M | $3,360.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HSAV | +0.14% | +0.45% | +1.49% | +1.82% | +9.44% |
PSA | +0.17% | +0.54% | +1.79% | +2.19% | +10.27% | |
| Flows | HSAV | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$433 M |
PSA | +$23 M | +$210 M | +$152 M | +$112 M | -$660 M |
HSAV vs PSA exposure
Countries
HSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HSAV
PSA
| Provider | Global X | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.21% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 6, 2020 | October 10, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about HSAV and PSA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HSAV or PSA?
As of October 26, 2026, HSAV has returned 1.49% year to date, while PSA has returned 1.79%. PSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HSAV or PSA?
As of October 26, 2026, HSAV manages $1.94 B in assets, while PSA manages $3.36 B. PSA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HSAV and PSA managed?
HSAV is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. PSA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HSAV or PSA?
Year to date, HSAV has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$152.34 M for PSA. PSA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HSAV and PSA compare?
HSAV has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while PSA has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about HSAV and PSA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.