VS
Hamilton US Mid-Cap Financials ETF - CAD (HUM) and BMO SPDR Real Estate Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLR) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HUM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance and Business Services, while ZXLR leans towards Finance and Technology. When evaluating costs, HUM features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLR. Performance-wise, HUM has returned 2.86% year-to-date with -$8 M in net flows, whereas ZXLR is at 9.66% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUM
ZXLR
| AuM | $21.08 M | $2.25 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUM | +0.02% | -3.08% | +2.86% | +7.95% | +72.56% |
ZXLR | -0.35% | -5.72% | +9.66% | +2.78% | - | |
| Flows | HUM | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$8 M | -$11 M | -$12 M |
ZXLR | -$1 M | -$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | - |
HUM vs ZXLR exposure
Countries
HUM
USA
92.93%
Other
7.07%
ZXLR
USA
99.91%
Sectors
HUM
Finance
97.34%
ZXLR
Finance
98.56%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUM
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.60%
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
3.36%
SouthState Bank Corp.
3.11%
UMB Financial Corp.
3.06%
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
3.03%
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
3.01%
Old National Bancorp
2.75%
TPG, Inc.
2.51%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.46%
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
2.44%
ZXLR
Welltower, Inc.
11.43%
Prologis, Inc.
9.09%
Equinix, Inc.
7.07%
American Tower Corp.
5.61%
Equity Residential
4.94%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
4.92%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
4.72%
Ventas, Inc.
4.58%
Public Storage
4.58%
Realty Income Corp.
4.49%
Diversification
HUM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 62 total
29.32%
ZXLR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.42%
Characteristics
Compare
HUM
ZXLR
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Real Estate Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.30% | 3.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about HUM and ZXLR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUM or ZXLR?
As of October 20, 2026, HUM has returned 2.86% year to date, while ZXLR has returned 9.66%. ZXLR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUM or ZXLR?
As of October 20, 2026, HUM manages $21.08 M in assets, while ZXLR manages $2.25 M. HUM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUM and ZXLR managed?
HUM is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZXLR is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Real Estate Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do HUM and ZXLR emphasize?
HUM is most exposed to Finance and Business Services. ZXLR is most exposed to Finance and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUM or ZXLR?
Year to date, HUM has seen -$8.27 M in net flows, compared with +$1.29 M for ZXLR. ZXLR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUM and ZXLR compare?
HUM has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while ZXLR has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of HUM and ZXLR?
HUM's largest holdings include LPL Financial Holdings, Inc., Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., and SouthState Bank Corp.. ZXLR's top holdings include Welltower, Inc., Prologis, Inc., and Equinix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HUM or ZXLR?
HUM holds 62 securities, while ZXLR holds 30. On holdings count, HUM is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HUM and ZXLR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.