HXQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HXQ fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HXQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while HBNK leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HXQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, HXQ has returned 8.74% year-to-date with +$65 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 14.52% with -$446 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HXQ
+12.90%+7.09%+8.74%+37.88%+112.37%
HBNK
+10.86%+13.01%+14.52%+66.58%-
Flows
HXQ
+$16 M+$35 M+$65 M+$171 M+$137 M
HBNK
-$204 M-$396 M-$446 M-$703 M-

HXQ vs HBNK exposure

Countries

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%

Diversification

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
HXQ
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 19, 2016July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about HXQ and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXQ or HBNK?
As of May 1, 2026, HXQ has returned 8.74% year to date, while HBNK has returned 14.52%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXQ or HBNK?
As of May 1, 2026, HXQ manages $1.51 B in assets, while HBNK manages $694.07 M. HXQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXQ and HBNK managed?
HXQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXQ and HBNK emphasize?
HXQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXQ or HBNK?
Year to date, HXQ has seen +$65.41 M in net flows, compared with -$446.18 M for HBNK. HXQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXQ and HBNK compare?
HXQ has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of HXQ and HBNK?
HXQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. HBNK's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HXQ or HBNK?
HXQ holds 93 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, HXQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HXQ and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds