VS
Compare Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ) vs Scotia US Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HXQ provides Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare exposures, while SITU is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HXQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.05% for SITU. Performance-wise, HXQ has returned 20.04% year-to-date with +$294 M in net flows, whereas SITU is at 16.3% with +$669 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HXQ
SITU
| AuM | $1,902.72 M | $4,765.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HXQ | -2.88% | +3.26% | +20.04% | +18.00% | +109.95% |
SITU | -0.47% | +3.83% | +16.30% | +15.43% | +94.75% | |
| Flows | HXQ | +$54 M | +$106 M | +$294 M | +$325 M | +$475 M |
SITU | +$36 M | +$147 M | +$669 M | +$1,031 M | +$2,768 M |
HXQ vs SITU exposure
Countries
HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
SITU
USA
97.39%
Sectors
HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
SITU
Technology
45.22%
Finance
13.33%
Healthcare
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.82%
Industrials
7.48%
Other
15.88%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
SITU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.82%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.98%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
SITU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 505 total
37.28%
Characteristics
Compare
HXQ
SITU
| Provider | Global X | Scotia Bank |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Indirect | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 19, 2016 | March 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about HXQ and SITU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXQ or SITU?
As of October 20, 2026, HXQ has returned 20.04% year to date, while SITU has returned 16.30%. HXQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXQ or SITU?
As of October 20, 2026, HXQ manages $1.90 B in assets, while SITU manages $4.77 B. SITU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXQ and SITU managed?
HXQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. SITU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXQ and SITU emphasize?
HXQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. SITU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXQ or SITU?
Year to date, HXQ has seen +$294.31 M in net flows, compared with +$668.55 M for SITU. SITU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXQ and SITU compare?
HXQ has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while SITU has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of HXQ and SITU?
HXQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. SITU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HXQ or SITU?
HXQ holds 101 securities, while SITU holds 500. On holdings count, SITU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HXQ and SITU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.