HXQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HXQ fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HXQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while XIC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, HXQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, HXQ has returned 8.74% year-to-date with +$65 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 7.87% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HXQ
+12.90%+7.09%+8.74%+37.88%+112.37%
XIC
+6.57%+6.98%+7.87%+39.98%+79.31%
Flows
HXQ
+$16 M+$35 M+$65 M+$171 M+$137 M
XIC
+$1,151 M+$4,154 M+$5,138 M+$7,659 M+$11,101 M

HXQ vs XIC exposure

Countries

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
98.95%

Sectors

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
28.13%
Energy
18.01%
Materials
15.92%
Other
13.03%
Other
24.92%
As of April 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.69%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.31%
ENBRIDGE
3.50%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.01%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.01%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
CA11271J1075
2.65%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.61%
BNS
2.53%

Diversification

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
35.80%

Characteristics

Compare
HXQ
XIC
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USDS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.08%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 19, 2016February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about HXQ and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXQ or XIC?
As of April 30, 2026, HXQ has returned 8.74% year to date, while XIC has returned 7.87%. HXQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXQ or XIC?
As of April 30, 2026, HXQ manages $1.51 B in assets, while XIC manages $28.82 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXQ and XIC managed?
HXQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXQ and XIC emphasize?
HXQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. XIC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXQ or XIC?
Year to date, HXQ has seen +$65.41 M in net flows, compared with +$5,138.12 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXQ and XIC compare?
HXQ has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of HXQ and XIC?
HXQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. XIC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: HXQ or XIC?
HXQ holds 93 securities, while XIC holds 193. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HXQ and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds