HXQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HXQ fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HXQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, HXQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HXQ has returned 8.74% year-to-date with +$65 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.32% with -$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HXQ
+12.90%+7.09%+8.74%+37.88%+112.37%
ZUT
-0.63%+12.47%+15.32%+28.73%+38.60%
Flows
HXQ
+$16 M+$35 M+$65 M+$171 M+$137 M
ZUT
+$25 M-$37 M-$60 M+$129 M+$254 M

HXQ vs ZUT exposure

Countries

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
HXQ
ZUT
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.91%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 19, 2016January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about HXQ and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXQ or ZUT?
As of May 1, 2026, HXQ has returned 8.74% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXQ or ZUT?
As of May 1, 2026, HXQ manages $1.51 B in assets, while ZUT manages $873.00 M. HXQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXQ and ZUT managed?
HXQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXQ and ZUT emphasize?
HXQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXQ or ZUT?
Year to date, HXQ has seen +$65.41 M in net flows, compared with -$60.16 M for ZUT. HXQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXQ and ZUT compare?
HXQ has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of HXQ and ZUT?
HXQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HXQ or ZUT?
HXQ holds 93 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, HXQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HXQ and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds