VS
When evaluating costs, HYLD features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HYLD has returned 3.99% year-to-date with +$81 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 13.73% with -$59 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HYLD
ZUT
| AuM | $1,053.65 M | $862.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 2.37% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HYLD | +15.93% | +2.94% | +3.99% | +36.03% | +74.00% |
ZUT | -0.80% | +11.40% | +13.73% | +27.52% | +36.69% | |
| Flows | HYLD | -$3 M | +$54 M | +$81 M | +$186 M | +$472 M |
ZUT | +$18 M | -$34 M | -$59 M | +$132 M | +$256 M |
HYLD vs ZUT exposure
Countries
HYLD
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%
Sectors
HYLD
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of April 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HYLD
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%
Diversification
HYLD
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%
Characteristics
Compare
HYLD
ZUT
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.09% | 2.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 4, 2022 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about HYLD and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HYLD or ZUT?
As of April 29, 2026, HYLD has returned 3.99% year to date, while ZUT has returned 13.73%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HYLD or ZUT?
As of April 29, 2026, HYLD manages $1.05 B in assets, while ZUT manages $862.35 M. HYLD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HYLD and ZUT managed?
HYLD is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HYLD or ZUT?
Year to date, HYLD has seen +$81.03 M in net flows, compared with -$58.72 M for ZUT. HYLD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HYLD and ZUT compare?
HYLD has an expense ratio of 2.37%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about HYLD and ZUT
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.