VS
Compare CI Invesco International Developed Multifactor Index ETF (IIMF) vs Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IIMF provides Technology, Industrials, and Finance exposures, while FLUR is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, IIMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.09% for FLUR. Performance-wise, IIMF has returned 17.51% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas FLUR is at 14.02% with +$107 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IIMF
FLUR
| AuM | $84.22 M | $623.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.97% | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IIMF | -0.48% | +1.02% | +17.51% | +21.51% | +63.63% |
FLUR | +0.15% | +1.05% | +14.02% | +15.15% | +74.00% | |
| Flows | IIMF | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$9 M | -$13 M | +$57 M |
FLUR | +$6 M | +$24 M | +$107 M | +$132 M | +$274 M |
IIMF vs FLUR exposure
Countries
IIMF
Japan
14.39%
Republic of Korea
13.19%
United Kingdom
12.84%
Switzerland
11.82%
France
9.42%
Australia
7.51%
Other
30.83%
FLUR
Japan
21.38%
United Kingdom
14.28%
Switzerland
9.37%
Germany
8.79%
France
8.39%
Australia
7.56%
Other
30.24%
Sectors
IIMF
Technology
15.39%
Industrials
14.63%
Finance
14.48%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.48%
Healthcare
12.28%
Non-Energy Materials
7.92%
Other
22.82%
FLUR
Finance
28.69%
Industrials
15.56%
Technology
12.00%
Healthcare
10.09%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.96%
Other
25.69%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IIMF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.84%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.40%
Roche Holding AG
2.83%
Novartis AG
2.77%
Shell Plc
2.54%
Nestlé SA
2.40%
Investor AB
1.87%
3i Group Plc
1.48%
SAP SE
1.47%
Safran SA
1.30%
FLUR
ASML Holding NV
3.05%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.64%
Roche Holding AG
1.48%
Novartis AG
1.32%
Shell Plc
1.18%
Nestlé SA
1.18%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.18%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.15%
Siemens AG
1.11%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.11%
Diversification
IIMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 866 total
25.89%
FLUR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 695 total
14.41%
Characteristics
Compare
IIMF
FLUR
| Provider | CI | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.66% | 1.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about IIMF and FLUR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IIMF or FLUR?
As of October 16, 2026, IIMF has returned 17.51% year to date, while FLUR has returned 14.02%. IIMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IIMF or FLUR?
As of October 16, 2026, IIMF manages $84.22 M in assets, while FLUR manages $623.51 M. FLUR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IIMF and FLUR managed?
IIMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. FLUR is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IIMF and FLUR emphasize?
IIMF is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance. FLUR is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IIMF or FLUR?
Year to date, IIMF has seen -$8.56 M in net flows, compared with +$106.53 M for FLUR. FLUR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IIMF and FLUR compare?
IIMF has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while FLUR has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of IIMF and FLUR?
IIMF's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc., and Roche Holding AG. FLUR's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: IIMF or FLUR?
IIMF holds 850 securities, while FLUR holds 686. On holdings count, IIMF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IIMF and FLUR
International Opportunities Expand in 2026
As global market leadership broadens beyond the United States, investors are increasingly revisiting international equities. Franklin International Equity Index ETF – FLUR offers diversified developed-market exposure aligned with shifting global opportunities.
Posted on 4/1/2026 by Franklin Templeton inGlobal
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.