VS
Compare CI Invesco International Developed Multifactor Index ETF (IIMF) vs Scotia International Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IIMF provides Technology, Industrials, and Finance exposures, while SITI is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, IIMF features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.15% for SITI. Performance-wise, IIMF has returned 17.51% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas SITI is at 13.94% with +$265 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IIMF
SITI
| AuM | $84.22 M | $1,294.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.97% | -0.33% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IIMF | -0.48% | +1.02% | +17.51% | +21.51% | +63.63% |
SITI | +0.13% | +1.03% | +13.94% | +15.06% | +73.64% | |
| Flows | IIMF | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$9 M | -$13 M | +$57 M |
SITI | +$127 M | +$153 M | +$265 M | +$365 M | +$784 M |
IIMF vs SITI exposure
Countries
IIMF
Japan
14.39%
Republic of Korea
13.19%
United Kingdom
12.84%
Switzerland
11.82%
France
9.42%
Australia
7.51%
Other
30.83%
SITI
Japan
26.13%
United Kingdom
13.26%
Switzerland
8.75%
Germany
8.25%
France
7.73%
Australia
7.07%
Other
28.80%
Sectors
IIMF
Technology
15.39%
Industrials
14.63%
Finance
14.48%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.48%
Healthcare
12.28%
Non-Energy Materials
7.92%
Other
22.82%
SITI
Finance
27.74%
Industrials
15.86%
Technology
12.95%
Healthcare
9.62%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.09%
Non-Energy Materials
7.15%
Other
18.59%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IIMF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.84%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.40%
Roche Holding AG
2.83%
Novartis AG
2.77%
Shell Plc
2.54%
Nestlé SA
2.40%
Investor AB
1.87%
3i Group Plc
1.48%
SAP SE
1.47%
Safran SA
1.30%
SITI
ASML Holding NV
2.77%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.54%
Roche Holding AG
1.33%
Novartis AG
1.20%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.13%
Shell Plc
1.09%
Nestlé SA
1.09%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.05%
Siemens AG
1.03%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.02%
Diversification
IIMF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 866 total
25.89%
SITI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 894 total
13.26%
Characteristics
Compare
IIMF
SITI
| Provider | CI | Scotia Bank |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.66% | 2.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | March 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about IIMF and SITI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IIMF or SITI?
As of October 16, 2026, IIMF has returned 17.51% year to date, while SITI has returned 13.94%. IIMF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IIMF or SITI?
As of October 16, 2026, IIMF manages $84.22 M in assets, while SITI manages $1.29 B. SITI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IIMF and SITI managed?
IIMF is passively managed by CI. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index - CAD benchmark. SITI is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IIMF and SITI emphasize?
IIMF is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance. SITI is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IIMF or SITI?
Year to date, IIMF has seen -$8.56 M in net flows, compared with +$264.57 M for SITI. SITI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IIMF and SITI compare?
IIMF has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while SITI has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of IIMF and SITI?
IIMF's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc., and Roche Holding AG. SITI's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: IIMF or SITI?
IIMF holds 850 securities, while SITI holds 880. On holdings count, SITI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IIMF and SITI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.