VS
Compare CI Invesco International Developed Multifactor Index ETF (IIMF.F) vs Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX) to find the best fit for your portfolio. IIMF.F provides Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while QDX is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, IIMF.F features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.17% for QDX. Performance-wise, IIMF.F has returned 16.07% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas QDX is at 13.09% with +$463 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IIMF.F
QDX
| AuM | $14.46 M | $1,984.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.67% | -0.38% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IIMF.F | -2.58% | -2.50% | +16.07% | +28.93% | +51.48% |
QDX | -2.58% | +0.53% | +13.09% | +17.70% | +66.46% | |
| Flows | IIMF.F | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$10 M |
QDX | +$269 M | +$332 M | +$463 M | +$549 M | +$842 M |
IIMF.F vs QDX exposure
Countries
IIMF.F
Japan
14.54%
United Kingdom
13.55%
Switzerland
12.29%
Republic of Korea
10.64%
France
9.71%
Australia
7.77%
Other
31.49%
QDX
Japan
25.45%
United Kingdom
13.73%
Switzerland
9.06%
Germany
8.24%
France
7.98%
Australia
7.15%
Other
28.40%
Sectors
IIMF.F
Finance
14.93%
Industrials
14.53%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.53%
Healthcare
12.88%
Technology
12.78%
Non-Energy Materials
7.71%
Other
23.63%
QDX
Finance
28.13%
Industrials
16.06%
Technology
11.47%
Healthcare
9.95%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.49%
Other
25.90%
As of September 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IIMF.F
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.47%
Novartis AG
2.97%
Roche Holding AG
2.88%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.68%
Nestlé SA
2.60%
Shell Plc
2.60%
Investor AB
1.88%
3i Group Plc
1.54%
Sanofi
1.33%
Safran SA
1.32%
QDX
ASML Holding NV
2.80%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.63%
Roche Holding AG
1.37%
Novartis AG
1.26%
Nestlé SA
1.17%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.14%
Shell Plc
1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.11%
Siemens AG
1.03%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.93%
Diversification
IIMF.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 866 total
24.26%
QDX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 896 total
13.55%
Characteristics
Compare
IIMF.F
QDX
| Provider | CI | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor (CAD Hedged) Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.69% | 2.36% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | January 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about IIMF.F and QDX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IIMF.F or QDX?
As of September 15, 2026, IIMF.F has returned 16.07% year to date, while QDX has returned 13.09%. IIMF.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IIMF.F or QDX?
As of September 15, 2026, IIMF.F manages $14.46 M in assets, while QDX manages $1.98 B. QDX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IIMF.F and QDX managed?
IIMF.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor (CAD Hedged) Index - CAD benchmark. QDX is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do IIMF.F and QDX emphasize?
IIMF.F is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QDX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IIMF.F or QDX?
Year to date, IIMF.F has seen -$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$463.33 M for QDX. QDX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IIMF.F and QDX compare?
IIMF.F has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while QDX has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of IIMF.F and QDX?
IIMF.F's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Roche Holding AG, and Novartis AG. QDX's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: IIMF.F or QDX?
IIMF.F holds 850 securities, while QDX holds 882. On holdings count, QDX is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about IIMF.F and QDX
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.