VS
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ) and CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that JEPQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare, while QQC leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, JEPQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.2% for QQC. Performance-wise, JEPQ has returned 11.55% year-to-date with +$101 M in net flows, whereas QQC is at 16.78% with +$625 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
JEPQ
QQC
| AuM | $237.80 M | $2,228.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | JEPQ | +2.78% | +0.78% | +11.55% | +22.14% | - |
QQC | -3.61% | -4.78% | +16.78% | +26.27% | +93.76% | |
| Flows | JEPQ | +$15 M | +$52 M | +$101 M | +$116 M | - |
QQC | +$62 M | +$319 M | +$625 M | +$815 M | +$1,552 M |
JEPQ vs QQC exposure
Countries
JEPQ
USA
90.65%
Other
9.35%
QQC
USA
93.42%
Sectors
JEPQ
Technology
66.81%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.51%
Other
21.68%
QQC
Technology
66.64%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
20.96%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
JEPQ
NVIDIA Corp.
8.30%
Apple, Inc.
7.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.33%
Microsoft Corp.
6.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.21%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.93%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.92%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.91%
Broadcom Inc.
2.75%
Lam Research Corp.
2.43%
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Diversification
JEPQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 92 total
50.51%
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
Characteristics
Compare
JEPQ
QQC
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.71% | 0.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 27, 2024 | May 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about JEPQ and QQC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: JEPQ or QQC?
As of September 2, 2026, JEPQ has returned 11.55% year to date, while QQC has returned 16.78%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: JEPQ or QQC?
As of September 2, 2026, JEPQ manages $237.80 M in assets, while QQC manages $2.23 B. QQC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are JEPQ and QQC managed?
JEPQ is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index. QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do JEPQ and QQC emphasize?
JEPQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: JEPQ or QQC?
Year to date, JEPQ has seen +$101.26 M in net flows, compared with +$624.93 M for QQC. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of JEPQ and QQC compare?
JEPQ has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of JEPQ and QQC?
JEPQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQC's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: JEPQ or QQC?
JEPQ holds 90 securities, while QQC holds 100. On holdings count, QQC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about JEPQ and QQC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.