VS
When evaluating costs, KILO features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.16% for VALT.U. Performance-wise, KILO has returned 7.74% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas VALT.U is at 7.41% with -$112 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
KILO
VALT.U
| AuM | $508.73 M | $167.19 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KILO | -2.66% | -4.85% | -7.74% | -0.45% | +93.68% |
VALT.U | -2.58% | -5.15% | -7.41% | +1.42% | +103.05% | |
| Flows | KILO | +$5 M | +$53 M | +$95 M | +$133 M | +$276 M |
VALT.U | +$5 M | -$67 M | -$112 M | -$127 M | +$41 M |
KILO vs VALT.U exposure
Countries
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
VALT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
VALT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
VALT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
VALT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
KILO
VALT.U
| Provider | Purpose Investments | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LBMA Gold Price AM - USD | Gold Price - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Commodity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 31, 2018 | January 6, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about KILO and VALT.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: KILO or VALT.U?
As of November 6, 2026, KILO has returned -7.74% year to date, while VALT.U has returned -7.41%. VALT.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: KILO or VALT.U?
As of November 6, 2026, KILO manages $508.73 M in assets, while VALT.U manages $167.19 M. KILO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are KILO and VALT.U managed?
KILO is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price AM - USD benchmark. VALT.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Gold Price - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: KILO or VALT.U?
Year to date, KILO has seen +$94.68 M in net flows, compared with -$111.99 M for VALT.U. KILO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of KILO and VALT.U compare?
KILO has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while VALT.U has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about KILO and VALT.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.