KILO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF

Full KILO fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, KILO features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, KILO has returned 4.63% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 14.03% with +$412 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Jul 27Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 26, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
KILO
+12.05%+0.94%+4.63%+32.02%+126.22%
ZSP
+1.83%+2.81%+14.03%+20.18%+82.22%
Flows
KILO
+$16 M+$13 M+$56 M+$142 M+$239 M
ZSP
-$0 M+$39 M+$412 M+$880 M+$4,983 M

KILO vs ZSP exposure

Countries

KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.51%

Sectors

KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
44.85%
Finance
14.06%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.97%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
15.53%
As of August 26, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Apple, Inc.
7.66%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.24%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.07%
Broadcom Inc.
2.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%

Diversification

KILO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.19%

Characteristics

Compare
KILO
ZSP
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkLBMA Gold Price AM - USDS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCommodityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 31, 2018November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about KILO and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: KILO or ZSP?
As of August 26, 2026, KILO has returned 4.63% year to date, while ZSP has returned 14.03%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: KILO or ZSP?
As of August 26, 2026, KILO manages $536.34 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.39 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are KILO and ZSP managed?
KILO is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the LBMA Gold Price AM - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: KILO or ZSP?
Year to date, KILO has seen +$56.17 M in net flows, compared with +$411.75 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of KILO and ZSP compare?
KILO has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about KILO and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds