VS
When evaluating costs, KNGX features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, KNGX has returned 13.25% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 28.12% with -$417 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
KNGX
HBNK
| AuM | $16.78 M | $806.59 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.36% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KNGX | +3.06% | +3.46% | +13.25% | +35.87% | - |
HBNK | +10.10% | +24.68% | +28.12% | +71.72% | - | |
| Flows | KNGX | +$0 M | +$7 M | +$7 M | +$8 M | - |
HBNK | +$16 M | -$168 M | -$417 M | -$668 M | - |
KNGX vs HBNK exposure
Countries
KNGX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
KNGX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
KNGX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
KNGX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
KNGX
HBNK
| Provider | Brompton Group | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Brompton Index One International Cash Flow Kings Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.60% | 2.61% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about KNGX and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: KNGX or HBNK?
As of June 17, 2026, KNGX has returned 13.25% year to date, while HBNK has returned 28.12%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: KNGX or HBNK?
As of June 17, 2026, KNGX manages $16.78 M in assets, while HBNK manages $806.59 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are KNGX and HBNK managed?
KNGX is passively managed by Brompton Group. It tracks the Brompton Index One International Cash Flow Kings Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: KNGX or HBNK?
Year to date, KNGX has seen +$6.81 M in net flows, compared with -$416.98 M for HBNK. KNGX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of KNGX and HBNK compare?
KNGX has an expense ratio of 0.36%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about KNGX and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.