MULV
Mackenzie US Low Volatility ETF

Full MULV fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, MULV features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, MULV has returned 12.16% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 15.35% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 21, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MULV
+2.94%+5.09%+12.16%+10.08%-
XIC
-0.84%+1.89%+15.35%+22.60%+104.36%
Flows
MULV
-$1 M-$2 M-$1 M-$1 M-
XIC
+$2,625 M+$4,621 M+$11,252 M+$12,269 M+$17,404 M

MULV vs XIC exposure

Countries

MULV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.58%

Sectors

MULV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 21, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MULV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%

Diversification

MULV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%

Characteristics

Compare
MULV
XIC
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.89%1.97%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateJune 6, 2024February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about MULV and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MULV or XIC?
As of October 21, 2026, MULV has returned 12.16% year to date, while XIC has returned 15.35%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MULV or XIC?
As of October 21, 2026, MULV manages $61.31 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.65 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MULV and XIC managed?
MULV is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MULV or XIC?
Year to date, MULV has seen -$0.79 M in net flows, compared with +$11,252.33 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MULV and XIC compare?
MULV has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about MULV and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds