VS
When evaluating costs, NRGI features a management fee (MER) of 1.5%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, NRGI has returned 37.29% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 24.12% with +$33 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGI
PPLN
| AuM | $130.01 M | $167.34 M |
| Management Fees | 1.50% | 0.74% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.40% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.26% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGI | +3.46% | +7.43% | +37.29% | +49.26% | +36.06% |
PPLN | +2.08% | -7.38% | +24.12% | +28.07% | +60.77% | |
| Flows | NRGI | +$2 M | +$10 M | +$32 M | +$19 M | -$18 M |
PPLN | +$34 M | +$39 M | +$33 M | +$102 M | +$114 M |
NRGI vs PPLN exposure
Countries
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Canada
99.58%
Sectors
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Energy
99.58%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Keyera Corp.
21.24%
South Bow Corp.
20.80%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
19.93%
Enbridge, Inc.
18.81%
TC Energy Corp.
18.80%
Diversification
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.58%
Characteristics
Compare
NRGI
PPLN
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.26% | 4.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 7, 2022 | July 14, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGI and PPLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGI or PPLN?
As of October 19, 2026, NRGI has returned 37.29% year to date, while PPLN has returned 24.12%. NRGI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGI or PPLN?
As of October 19, 2026, NRGI manages $130.01 M in assets, while PPLN manages $167.34 M. PPLN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGI and PPLN managed?
NRGI is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGI or PPLN?
Year to date, NRGI has seen +$31.75 M in net flows, compared with +$32.84 M for PPLN. PPLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGI and PPLN compare?
NRGI has an expense ratio of 3.40%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Recent articles about NRGI and PPLN
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Posted 5 days ago by Kyle Anthony inDividends
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.