NRGY
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF

Full NRGY fund page
VS
PPLN
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD

Full PPLN fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD (PPLN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. NRGY and PPLN provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, NRGY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, NRGY has returned 36.82% year-to-date with -$93 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 28.96% with -$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%May 8May 15May 25Jun 1Jun 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
NRGY
+5.07%+13.30%+36.82%+52.88%-
PPLN
+7.87%+10.64%+28.96%+41.80%+65.79%
Flows
NRGY
-$32 M-$85 M-$93 M-$53 M-
PPLN
-$1 M+$14 M-$13 M+$62 M+$68 M

NRGY vs PPLN exposure

Countries

NRGY
Canada
76.81%
Other
23.19%
PPLN
Canada
78.98%
Other
21.02%

Sectors

NRGY
Energy
76.81%
Other
23.19%
PPLN
Energy
78.98%
Other
21.02%
As of June 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

NRGY
CENOVUS ENERGY
9.47%
ARC RESOURCES
9.34%
SUNCOR ENERGY
8.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
8.83%
IMPERIAL OIL
8.55%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
8.05%
TC ENERGY CORP
7.97%
ENBRIDGE
7.95%
TOURMALINE OIL
7.79%
PPLN
KEYERA
20.23%
TC ENERGY CORP
20.04%
ENBRIDGE
19.37%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
19.34%

Diversification

NRGY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
76.81%
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
78.98%

Characteristics

Compare
NRGY
PPLN
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CADMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.10%4.25%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 7, 2024July 14, 2014

Frequently asked questions about NRGY and PPLN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGY or PPLN?
As of June 8, 2026, NRGY has returned 36.82% year to date, while PPLN has returned 28.96%. NRGY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGY or PPLN?
As of June 8, 2026, NRGY manages $277.31 M in assets, while PPLN manages $126.71 M. NRGY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGY and PPLN managed?
NRGY is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD benchmark. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do NRGY and PPLN emphasize?
NRGY is most exposed to Energy. PPLN is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGY or PPLN?
Year to date, NRGY has seen -$92.93 M in net flows, compared with -$12.79 M for PPLN. PPLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGY and PPLN compare?
NRGY has an expense ratio of 0.27%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of NRGY and PPLN?
NRGY's largest holdings include CENOVUS ENERGY, ARC RESOURCES, and SUNCOR ENERGY. PPLN's top holdings include KEYERA, TC ENERGY CORP, and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: NRGY or PPLN?
NRGY holds 9 securities, while PPLN holds 4. On holdings count, NRGY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about NRGY and PPLN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds