NRGY
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF

Full NRGY fund page
VS
XEG
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Full XEG fund page

Compare Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY) vs iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. NRGY and XEG provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, NRGY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for XEG. Performance-wise, NRGY has returned 36.74% year-to-date with -$94 M in net flows, whereas XEG is at 38.6% with +$169 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
NRGY
+1.40%+10.35%+36.74%+48.51%-
XEG
-3.10%+5.28%+38.60%+55.84%+104.09%
Flows
NRGY
-$16 M-$82 M-$94 M-$55 M-
XEG
+$23 M+$109 M+$169 M-$50 M-$747 M

NRGY vs XEG exposure

Countries

NRGY
Canada
76.81%
Other
23.19%
XEG
Canada
99.95%

Sectors

NRGY
Energy
76.81%
Other
23.19%
XEG
Energy
99.50%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

NRGY
CENOVUS ENERGY
9.47%
ARC RESOURCES
9.34%
SUNCOR ENERGY
8.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
8.83%
IMPERIAL OIL
8.55%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
8.05%
TC ENERGY CORP
7.97%
ENBRIDGE
7.95%
TOURMALINE OIL
7.79%
XEG
SUNCOR ENERGY
26.41%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
22.68%
CENOVUS ENERGY
13.03%
IMPERIAL OIL
6.61%
TOURMALINE OIL
5.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
4.71%
ARC RESOURCES
4.46%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
1.94%
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.50%
ATHABASCA OIL
1.39%

Diversification

NRGY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
76.81%
XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
88.60%

Characteristics

Compare
NRGY
XEG
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CADS&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.10%2.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 7, 2024March 19, 2001

Frequently asked questions about NRGY and XEG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGY or XEG?
As of June 12, 2026, NRGY has returned 36.74% year to date, while XEG has returned 38.60%. XEG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGY or XEG?
As of June 12, 2026, NRGY manages $275.70 M in assets, while XEG manages $2.32 B. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGY and XEG managed?
NRGY is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do NRGY and XEG emphasize?
NRGY is most exposed to Energy. XEG is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGY or XEG?
Year to date, NRGY has seen -$94.36 M in net flows, compared with +$169.44 M for XEG. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGY and XEG compare?
NRGY has an expense ratio of 0.27%, while XEG has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of NRGY and XEG?
NRGY's largest holdings include CENOVUS ENERGY, ARC RESOURCES, and SUNCOR ENERGY. XEG's top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, and CENOVUS ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: NRGY or XEG?
NRGY holds 9 securities, while XEG holds 26. On holdings count, XEG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about NRGY and XEG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds