VS
When evaluating costs, NRGY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, NRGY has returned 35.37% year-to-date with -$73 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.23% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGY
ZEB
| AuM | $289.09 M | $8,175.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.47% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.72% | -0.53% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGY | -2.62% | +0.15% | +35.37% | +38.91% | - |
ZEB | +2.87% | -1.03% | +32.23% | +44.54% | +171.78% | |
| Flows | NRGY | -$27 M | +$10 M | -$73 M | -$62 M | - |
ZEB | +$1,273 M | +$982 M | +$1,232 M | +$1,729 M | +$429 M |
NRGY vs ZEB exposure
Countries
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.14%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.99%
Bank of Montreal
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.49%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.45%
National Bank of Canada
16.14%
Diversification
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
NRGY
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.22% | 2.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGY and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGY or ZEB?
As of November 6, 2026, NRGY has returned 35.37% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.23%. NRGY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGY or ZEB?
As of November 6, 2026, NRGY manages $289.09 M in assets, while ZEB manages $8.18 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGY and ZEB managed?
NRGY is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGY or ZEB?
Year to date, NRGY has seen -$73.22 M in net flows, compared with +$1,232.37 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGY and ZEB compare?
NRGY has an expense ratio of 0.47%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about NRGY and ZEB
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Posted on 10/16/2026 by Kyle Anthony inDividends
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.