VS
When evaluating costs, NRGY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, NRGY has returned 35.37% year-to-date with -$73 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 21.32% with -$76 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGY
ZUT
| AuM | $289.09 M | $892.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.47% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.72% | -0.71% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGY | -2.62% | +0.15% | +35.37% | +38.91% | - |
ZUT | +4.34% | +2.54% | +21.32% | +15.44% | +71.25% | |
| Flows | NRGY | -$27 M | +$10 M | -$73 M | -$62 M | - |
ZUT | -$19 M | +$32 M | -$76 M | -$22 M | +$243 M |
NRGY vs ZUT exposure
Countries
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%
Sectors
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%
Diversification
NRGY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%
Characteristics
Compare
NRGY
ZUT
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.22% | 2.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGY and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGY or ZUT?
As of November 6, 2026, NRGY has returned 35.37% year to date, while ZUT has returned 21.32%. NRGY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGY or ZUT?
As of November 6, 2026, NRGY manages $289.09 M in assets, while ZUT manages $892.31 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGY and ZUT managed?
NRGY is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGY or ZUT?
Year to date, NRGY has seen -$73.22 M in net flows, compared with -$75.82 M for ZUT. NRGY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGY and ZUT compare?
NRGY has an expense ratio of 0.47%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about NRGY and ZUT
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Posted on 10/16/2026 by Kyle Anthony inDividends
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.